Since last week, Ms. Wu found that when she was at home, her mobile phone basically didn't ring and she couldn't make calls. At first Ms. Wu didn't care. After a few days, Ms. Wu called Mobile to ask if there was a signal problem, and the mobile staff checked her and told her that there was no signal problem in the area where she lived. The day before yesterday, when Ms. Wu was packing things at home, she found a silver instrument on the back of the sofa with an antenna. After careful study, it turned out to be a portable Cell Phone Signal Jammer Bag , Ms. Wu realized. She asked her husband angrily, and thought that her husband's actions violated her privacy, so the two quarreled and divorced. Husband: There is radiation on the phone, and I am doing it for her. "Actually, I am doing it for her." Ms. Wu's husband, Mr. Liu, was also full of grievances. He said that even knowing that he was pregnant, his wife could not change the bad habit of talking on the phone. "I read that there is radiation when talking on the phone. Radiation is not good for the fetus. How can she do it for a few hours?" Mr. Liu said, but no matter how he persuades, his wife just refuses to change. cell phone jammer
In desperation, he spent 500 yuan on the Internet to buy a Cell Phone Signal Jammer Bag . On this matter, the reporter came to Guizhou Chiyuan Law Firm for consultation. Lawyer Liu Guoyou from the law firm told reporters that the husband’s actions were illegal, installing mobile phone jammers, forcibly blocking personal communication and depriving individuals of the right to unblocked communication. This is an act that violates the freedom of communication of others. An infringement. Lawyer Liu said that there are currently no clear legal provisions on the right to freedom of communication, but the Constitution stipulates that citizens have the right to personal freedom, and that the right to freedom of communication belongs to the basic right of personal freedom. The husband's measures to block the mobile phone violated the right to freedom of communication, that is, the right to personal freedom in a disguised form. At the same time, Lawyer Liu told reporters that the "invasion of privacy" proposed by his wife, Ms. Wu, was not valid because the husband only blocked the signal so that it could not be received, and did not infringe on his privacy.
